-
Wed 27th Sep 2017 23:47 #1 / 13
Can anyone top this one?
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 00:08 #2 / 13i want equal amounts of blueberry's
Ouch... I put my money on pink....I bet dark blue is out first.....a deal has been made in my opinion
I play on any field of battle...not just three boards
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 00:12 #3 / 13
Wow. I sure can't. They discussed terminating back in April. Looks like it could be a while.
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 00:44 #4 / 13
I like how orange got booted and left a ridiculous wall of neutrals behind.
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 01:21 #5 / 13
Just another reason that map should be played with medium fog. I've seen many of the large maps played without fog and players just start turtling up and building forces as they become afraid to spend their units to expand (as others can see if they spread themselves too thin).
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 10:03 #6 / 13
Thingol wrote:
Just another reason that map should be played with medium fog. I've seen many of the large maps played without fog and players just start turtling up and building forces as they become afraid to spend their units to expand (as others can see if they spread themselves too thin).
Aye. I learned my lesson on this board to only play it fogged.
Certainly curious on the expected outcome of an 4100vs4100 A attack.
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 10:32 #7 / 13
Amidon37 wrote:
Certainly curious on the expected outcome of an 4100vs4100 A attack.
Attacker will win, and have about 600 units left over.
-
Thu 28th Sep 2017 11:34 #8 / 13
Thingol wrote:
Just another reason that map should be played with medium fog. I've seen many of the large maps played without fog and players just start turtling up and building forces as they become afraid to spend their units to expand (as others can see if they spread themselves too thin).
True. I have moved several boards to my "fog only" list.
Then again, for those who like having big armies and feeling like a general with proper divisions to command, nothing wrong with that.
-
Fri 29th Sep 2017 00:07 #9 / 13
i want equal amounts of blueberry's
Medium fog at the min
I play on any field of battle...not just three boards
-
Fri 29th Sep 2017 00:25 #10 / 13
I wish there was a way as a designer to allow fog levels with more granularity. I hate locking down fog to a single level, but I would hate even more having people play a board of mine with no fog and always getting into stalemates.
-
Fri 29th Sep 2017 00:41 #11 / 13
Ozyman wrote:
I wish there was a way as a designer to allow fog levels with more granularity. I hate locking down fog to a single level, but I would hate even more having people play a board of mine with no fog and always getting into stalemates.
+1.
I've also often wished that vision was a border attribute that we could control the same way we can control border modifiers.
-
Fri 29th Sep 2017 05:52 #12 / 13
Card Membership - putting the power of factories in your hand.
Just a response to the original question. Back on TOS, where territories have no caps on King of the Mountains, I saw a game that had tens of thousands on many of the territories. I think it lasted a year or so. It's the reason that I put terrain related caps on that board here.
-
Tue 3rd Oct 2017 11:06 #13 / 13
Kjeld wrote:
Amidon37 wrote:
Certainly curious on the expected outcome of an 4100vs4100 A attack.
Attacker will win, and have about 600 units left over.
Yup. Laughable how so many players don't know big number of trials means the statistic will closely follow the theoretical probability.
Kjeld wrote:
Ozyman wrote:
I wish there was a way as a designer to allow fog levels with more granularity. I hate locking down fog to a single level, but I would hate even more having people play a board of mine with no fog and always getting into stalemates.
+1.
I've also often wished that vision was a border attribute that we could control the same way we can control border modifiers.
+1 to both.
